- Lack of understanding of GenAI's impact on value creation
- Insufficient capability to scan for weak signals indicating disruption related to sustainability, GenAI, and trade/geopolitics
- Difficulty in translating disruptions into competitive advantage
- Other important issues crowding out discussion of external shocks and disruptions (38% of respondents)
- Inability of organizations to comply with new regulations (19% of directors cite this as a primary threat to sustainability goals)
- Conflicting views among stakeholders (activists, customers, employees, shareholders)
- Lack of alignment within the board and between directors and management (29% of directors unsure of management's ability to navigate disruption)
BCG, INSEAD Corporate Governance Centre, and Heidrick & Struggles
Greenhouse gas emissions & sustainability report data
Figures are as stated in the company's own report and may use different boundaries, units or methods (for example market-based vs location-based Scope 2), so compare with care.
📈 Emissions by Report Period
| Report period | Headline emissions figure reported |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 19.3K tCO2e/year |
| 2021 | 6.9K MT CO2e |
| 2020 | 8.8K metric tons CO2-equivalent (2019) |
Each row is the headline figure extracted from a different report; scope coverage and methodology can change between years.
✅ Reported Environmental Achievements
- Improved understanding of sustainability's impact on value creation (from 25% lacking confidence in 2023 to 9% in 2024)
- Improved capability to scan for weak signals of future sustainability shocks (from 37% lacking capability in 2023 to 24% in 2024)
- Improved development of plans to turn sustainability shocks into competitive advantage (from 46% lacking plans in 2023 to 27% in 2024)
🌱 ESG Focus Areas
SustainabilityGenerative AITrade and Geopolitics