PowerCell Sweden AB (publ)

Greenhouse gas emissions & sustainability report data

📊 Latest report period: 2023🗂️ Report periods on file: 2023

In its 2023 reporting, PowerCell Sweden AB (publ) disclosed greenhouse gas emissions of 50.1K tCO2e/year (2023). By scope: Scope 1: 14.5 tCO2e/year (2023); Scope 2: 42.5 tCO2e/year (2023); Scope 3: 50.0K tCO2e/year (2023). Figures are as stated in the company's own report and may use different boundaries, units or methods (for example market-based vs location-based Scope 2), so compare with care.

💨
GHG Emissions
50.1K tCO2e/year (2023)
2023
⚡
Renewable Energy
100% (electricity)
of total energy
💧
Water Usage
1.8K m3/year (2023)
2023
♻️
Waste
30.0K tons/year (2023)
2023
⚙️
Energy Use
2.2M kWh/year (2023)
2023

📊 Emissions by Scope (2023)

ScopeWhat it coversReported value
Scope 1Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls (fuel combustion, company vehicles, process and fugitive emissions).14.5 tCO2e/year (2023)
Scope 2Indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heat and cooling.42.5 tCO2e/year (2023)
Scope 3Other indirect emissions across the value chain (purchased goods, business travel, use of sold products, etc.).50.0K tCO2e/year (2023)

New to scopes? Read Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions explained and market-based vs location-based Scope 2.

✅ Reported Environmental Achievements

🌱 ESG Focus Areas

Reducing emissions from PowerCell’s operationsRobust and reliable productsSafe, stimulating workplacesResponsible sourcing

⚠️ Challenges & Risks +

  • Short-term risk of higher costs at supplier level due to climate change and increased environmental fees and regulations.
  • Medium- to long-term risk that weather changes may affect transport options and costs.
  • Short-term risk that PowerCell’s costs will increase due to inability to adjust prices and reduce energy consumption.
  • Short- to long-term risk that suppliers will fail to reduce energy consumption and increase energy efficiency.
  • Short-term risk that PowerCell or its suppliers will not succeed in establishing procedures for recycling and circular business models.
  • Potential for negative impacts on water and marine resources (low risk).
  • Potential for stricter regulation of PFAS in fuel cell stacks.
  • Short-term risk of workplace accidents and injuries.
  • Risk of not offering fair pay and reasonable terms of employment.
  • Risk of not being able to offer skills development.

📋 Report Information

Reporting Period: 2023
Frameworks: GRI Standards
Assurance: Öhrlings PricewaterhouseCoopers AB